Reviews and Comments
- ” Hello Everyone.
Here is a response I made to a letter from someone who, like so many I am sure, has problems
believing I’m still around, albeit now channeled through Andrew who has penned this book about our connection
as we are united quite literally: Mind, Body and Spirit as his friend Trisinya so wisely recently said to him
understanding the wonder of our unique fusion immediately being an incredibly gifted, intuitive and perceptive
woman and she involved, as Andrew currently is, with the charity "The British Heart Foundation" and ironically
his involvement commencing on August 31st 2012, this being a perfect note to close with."
With love from,
Diana xx
" The first thing I will draw your attention to being the fact that your opinions I am quite sure are
shared by many, so voicing them is something appreciated by me, though clearly I sense anyway in spite of
saying that you are wanting to believe it’s me, the odds against this happening are stacked highly against it and
that’s alright, you are under no obligation to do so. As I have said people will intuitively know it’s me, those who
are meant to do so and so not something dependent actually on validation at all, scientific or not! Those already
recognising me and including people who knew me in life sensing me, my personal energies present and my
intention at the moment is to reach those who knew me personally, so the few as opposed to the masses who didn’
t but instead knew and read about and saw enacted on the world stage the persona “Diana, Princess of Wales”, a
persona largely media based, media created and quite unlike the real Diana who was actually a pretty mercurial
character. At this point not all was hype, my work I took genuine interest in, you can’t sit on the bed of a little girl
with half her stomach blown away and who you know is going to die and you helpless to prevent this from
happening, if you are not caring and compassionate by nature as opposed to by design.
So this said I will now again draw attention to facts, neither of my boys have as yet anyway stepped
forward publicly to support ” US” ( Andrew and I ) but neither have either of them denied him and his claim as
seen by people to channel me and certainly if someone was pretending to be my Mother all over the net, I’d have
something to say about it were I not somewhat personally convinced of its validity so I can only deduce
therefore that there must exist a belief in it for them both! As I say people who are meant to will recognise me
and I would certainly imagine Wills and Harry particularly doing so. As for my saying private things to them only
we’d know, how do you know I haven’t ? I was often subtle about things in life, I learnt to be of course and as I
always say read between the lines. By example I said to Rosa that if Dodi gave me a ring, it would be worn by me
on the fourth finger of my right hand, it would have been so initially as a ” Friendship Ring” though selected from
an engagement collection of course , I’d have simply swapped it at the appropriate moment to the left hand, a
woman’s prerogative to change her mind when it was seen worn as an engagement ring. It helps to be friends with
your fiancee after all and I’d hardly be inclined to make the same mistake twice so equally unlikely therefore to
select a ring from such a collection, were it to be solely a ring of friendship and I would hardly have behaved
publicly in the manner I did with Dodi were he just a summer fling, a bit of fun as it has been reported.
I had my interests to protect as well as my reputation and wouldn’t have willingly given my
enemies ammunition to use against me, our antics as well as deliberate to ruffle a few feathers were also a means
of getting people accustomed to the fact we’d be together officially sooner or later, naturally something that
needed the boys blessing but as with their father and their acceptance of Camilla who clearly makes him happy,
they’d have welcomed seeing Mummy happy too I’m sure. I realise of course though on reflection that my
behaviour publicly with Dodi was irresponsible regarding what Will’s pals might have said when he got back to
school that September … boys will be boys! I was appreciative of his being concerned about our relationship,
albeit his being greatly influenced by family members around him at the time, he at Balmoral of course, so I
needed to be back in London to clarify things for him and so wish we hadn’t argued so a very real reason why I
wish to personally connect with him but he has free will as well as I would imagine anyway a keen understanding
of diplomacy which is why as I keep saying the truth about everything will be revealed after the death of “Her
Majesty”, people have decided for themselves I am meaning Paris by this statement, I have never said so myself
… everything is everything !
This is why it is also so necessary for me to return as myself and not the Higher – Self who might
well tell you in Spirit we all wear Halos and are surrounded by the most colourful hues unimaginable to man with
an innate sense of peace and love around us which is quite undefinable to man’s conception and understanding
which is actually so limited due to his willful intent towards scepticism and cynicism and to disbelieve and to
question anything which cannot be verified scientifically in text book fashion by him. Naturally living in a world
of materialism, a capitalist system as opposed to a more ethereal and humanitarian one, attitudes only to be
expected from him but were I to as I say tell you and others about the Spirit World, why would you believe me,
just because I said it! At times of course my Higher – self does come through as when I warned the journalist at
the Daily Express of the London bombings which four days later claimed 52 lives in the capital I having been
ignored, Andrew told to “F … Off” !
If as you make pretty clear you find it hard enough to believe that Diana is back, do you really
imagine yourself believing more that an Angel is amongst men ?
Now you mention the fact that I speak about my shaking hands with the man with A.I.D.S. in the
80′s rather too much. There’s a reason for this: as a way shower in life I am likewise a way – shower of the after
– life and as then man’s ignorance had made that man a victim, an outcast in society through a lack of
understanding and instead prejudice as a result of fear perhaps being illustrated, fuelled naturally by that all
important medium .. the Media of course. I am battling again now against people’s ignorance in failing to
recognise I’m back and primarily in this statement meaning the media who have been told it but who do not step
forward to even explore or to examine it but of course in doing so and finding it real, so therefore being seen to
be supporting me and so too Andrew, they’d then be supporting the fact I have said very clearly that the event
happening in Paris wasn’t an accident which is something they would hardly be inclined to do being greatly
influenced in the U.K. anyway by the establishment. An example of this being annually the “Queen’s Christmas
Message” was televised by the B.B.C. until 1995 when they televised my Panorama Interview, since that year it
has been broadcast by their greatest rival network I.T.V. It is imperative that I make my return as the most
easily recognisable Diana so by example one who as Panorama clearly shows was an expert manipulator when
she needed to be. I planned it all A-Z which included giving my staff the night off when it was recorded and it was
scripted, unlike the interviews conducted with Rose Campbell which are unrehearsed. So now we come to
Andrew’s part in all of this:
He’s a bloody good glove – puppet actually, he opens his mouth, my words pop out and he
doesn’t get a say in the matter. It can’t surely be imagined that he’d stick his neck out and say the things that have
been said, and Paris being a fine example of this, just for the sake of saying them, to make an impression. He
doesn’t have a death wish, to my knowledge anyway, so think about it and realise the things said by me through
him are pretty hard hitting and again read between the lines after all it would hardly be in my best interest to
present the bullet with which to shoot him with would it?! As I have also said for what point would he make
something like this up, to achieve exactly what if proven as were this the case it would be naturally, to wind up
being as globally reviled as the likes of Saddam Hussein or Hitler which he would be, to be seen as someone so
cold, so despicable, so mercenary as to write to Wills in 2000 telling him he channels me knowing the
tremendous bond my boys and I shared. I’d hardly imagine so, would you? As for financially gaining from it, to
date he hasn’t at all and as he has said the financial gains will largely be used for the funding of three hospices in
my name being built, hospices which will then need staffing so will prove costly naturally but were Andrew of the
character to involve himself in something for such shallow reasoning, he’d not have been selected for the job …
to ensure my work continues unchanged and to prove to the world that she who said it of herself in life meant it:
“She Won’t Go Quietly !”
With love from,
Diana xx
- Hi Everyone,
- I've read this little e-book with great interest, and although those of us receiving this email have heard these
stories many times, in many emails, it is helpful to have it all written down in chronological order up until the
connexion with Rose, the setting up of the current DianaSpeaks site and the two seminars in the USA. I note
the manuscript does not go further than this about Andrew's return to Lohr am Main or his current stay in
London. It is perhaps deliberate that his current wheareabouts are not stated even vaguely, and in any case it
has to be admitted that in recent years not much has happened which is new or relevant to the verification it is
Diana speaking thru Andrew or to gain it more widespread recognition. We feel this is still to come. At least this
is what we all hope, and have been told by Spirit.
It is interesting that, even though Diana declined to speak thru Andrew with Andrew Morton, he went off in a
huff not blaming Andrew Russell-Davis or accusing him of being a fraud, but clearly blaming Diana as the
'Princess of Whinge' or some similar phrase. This clearly indicates he recognized it would be exactly as Diana
would react to a journalist who insisted the crash in Paris was merely an 'accident'.
All the doubters, who we all know - those who think Andrew and the rest of us are crazy, would surely be
convinced it they read this little e-book by Andrew. People like Penny Thornton, Andrew Morton and of course
William himself would have recognized a fraud and ignored him or accused him to his face. On the contrary,
their responses all prove they knew instinctively it was Diana speaking thru Andrew.
Even more telling is what has not been said. Neither William, Harry, Earl Spencer nor anyone else has accused
Andrew of being a fraud or tried to have the DianaSpeaks site shut down. True the first one was tampered with
or mysteriously became corrupted, but since then the Establishment/intelligence services have evidently
thought it best to ignore it rather than draw attention to it. Something banned or censored immediately attracts
attention. They must also know, after the first site was corrupted/sabotaged, that the content is preserved and
closing one site will just mean another with the same controversial content will be set up.
Just as Diana could not be silenced by the crash in Paris, nor can her channeling or her website content be
silenced. Even were Andrew to be out of the picture, Diana would find another way of communicating, and
indeed she does so thru Rose and others, though not in the unique way the Earthbound Diana communicates
thru Andrew.
All this is prelimary to the work taking off, and there must be such background information on who Andrew
Russell-Davie is since he is not well-known medium or channeler. The fact he does not charge for the
channeling will go a long way to convincing people it is real.
The only thing I would say is that not enough importance is given, in my opinion, to the unique podcast
interviews by Andrew, Diana and Rose. These are what convinced me, along with a phone call from Diana, that
it really was her channeling thru Andrew.
All the best,
Tony P.
- " Hello Tony,
Thank you very much for a detailed review of Andrew's book which is something very much
appreciated. You indeed make some very valid points and the one about Andrew Morton's reaction is one that
tells rather a lot. A journalist who already having made rather a lot of money out of me you would have thought
would be rather inclined to have tried to persuade me to speak to him albeit of course channeled through Andrew
unless of course he did know me as being the stubborn bitch who when she said no in her sometimes petulant
manner, meant it and there would be nothing gained in trying to convince me otherwise!
Also of course had Andrew been faking the connection with me, firstly Penny would have, as you say,
have deduced this from the initial conversation had with Andrew from Malmo in Sweden where he was living at
the time so consequently would not have invited him to the U.K. and much less to stay in her home, after all
Andrew could have been anyone. Clearly the recognition was instant but Penny a highly intelligent business
woman justifying this in her preliminary question to me on that call and my able to volunteer the answer
convincing her of the authenticity of it's being me. In truth Penny having been one to say that the likelihood of
the embracing of the connection between Andrew and I publicly being something highly improbable as it is a
highly sensitive issue naturally. Never the less she did though and through our meeting again, I was able to
apologise to her and make amends which I am personally so grateful for her giving me the opportunity to do.
Now had the invitation not have been made of course, Andrew would not have met Andrew Morton
at all but as I say had he have convinced Penny but was in fact faking everything then he surely would not have
told Andrew Morton that I had nothing to say to him but alternatively would have taken full advantage of the
fact that here he was in the company of someone with enough influence to have assisted Andrew in becoming
well known himself, quite possibly to have written a follow up to the book initially he was involved with being
"Diana: Her True Story - in her own words". On my site things I said in the book spoken whilst I was still on the
earth-plane of course have been re-written by me as channeled directly through Andrew so are interesting to
compare. Anyway my point being the fact the fusion is a very real one, Andrew was not allowed to intervene and
entice Andrew Morton to stay having flown in from New York to meet. I do appreciate how disappointing this
was for everyone concerned not least of all myself as had things have worked out differently I might well have
had my say and it to have been in print by now but clearly Andrew before the interview began was meant to off
the radar ask his question to Andrew Morton about what happened in Paris?
- (The changes Diana speaks about above can be found here on her site:
http://www.dianaspeaks.info/CurrentMessages2.html )
As for your comment regarding the After - Life interviews with Rose which I know went a long way
in convincing you of it's being me speaking, they are something which people can listen to and learn a lot from of
course doing so but not something all will be personally inclined to doing, time consuming and many will hear a
voice that clearly is not a carbon - copy of mine so will immediately be put off by this. As you say it is not the
voice so much as the cadence of speech, the vocabulary used but above all the energy of the communications all
of which are very different to Andrew's as would be expected for them to be. This is why in Andrew's letter to
William in 2000, mine to him was included so he could see this marked difference for himself as he would
recognise his Mummy's style of writing and not of course know Andrew's. This is why in calling my brother
Charles at Althorp, Andrew spoke first and then I did so the difference in our vocal intonation would be obvious
and I left the message for him of something said privately by me to him in life. I do though fully understand that
for many these communications whether by telephone, email or letter to people will be viewed suspiciously or
seen as the rantings of a nut-job and people cannot be criticised for jumping to this conclusion as indeed even
some of Andrew's own friends have found it difficult to credit and believe being real so it is somewhat refreshing
when people do know that it is me speaking and writing to them and I am enormously grateful to them for their
help and support of both Andrew and me so including you Tony.
Your selfless kindness to Andrew in numerous ways is so very much appreciated since his arrival
back in the United Kingdom but the book deliberately does not concern his life at the moment as in relation to
his mission nothing is happening on the surface anyway at all and as he has been told won't until he is abroad
again wherever this might be. Here he has had unfinished personal business to sort out including of course
serious health issues and not as some people might assume psychological ones to deal with. Also there has been a
hiatus regarding the After - Life Interviews continuing whilst he has been here as circumstances for him have
indeed changed but I am sure sooner as opposed to later he will be on the move again being as I was, somewhat of
a "Free Spirit" by nature.
With love from,
Diana xx
